Today, I'd like to welcome fellow Crooked{Cat} Publishing author, Frances di Plino, who has come to give her views about what makes a really excellent character.
Getting to know you, getting to know all about you!
By
Frances di Plino
Regardless of genre, characters can make or break a novel.
How many times have you read something that could have been (should have been)
a great story, but the characters were so lacking in credibility that you lost
interest long before the end? I would bet my reputation as a writer that
everyone has read at least one novel fitting that description at some point in
their lives.
Developing characters so real our readers fall in love with
them, or despise them, is an art – one we have to learn if we want our novels
to satisfy our readers. We all know characters have to have a past that has
shaped them, a future they are striving towards, and a present they are dealing
with in order to get from one to the other. But how we use that information is
crucial. Readers don’t want a whole load of information dumped on them. They
want to get to know the character as the book progresses, in exactly the same
way as they would with a real life friend.
As Frances di Plino I run a book review site and, as the
real me, Lorraine Mace, I am a tutor for the Writers Bureau and also critique
fiction for Writers’ Forum. In both
guises, I get to read a lot of novel openings and short stories. One thing that
stops me dead every time is a massive chunk of back-story explaining everything
the author thinks the reader needs to
know about a character. This effectively kills the pace and bores the pants off
the reader (me).
It is our job to know our characters so well the type of
person they are is apparent in every action and piece of dialogue uttered. When
we get to that stage no back-story is needed.
There are various ways of getting inside the heads of
characters and finding the right method for you is as important as any other
aspect of writing. I use a mix and match of several techniques. As my
characters often have heated discussions in my head, I sometimes feel they’ve
developed just a little bit too much, but that’s another issue altogether.
I rarely describe my characters, but that doesn’t mean I
don’t have a full description of them ready to hand should I need to refer to
it. As a reader, I prefer my own imagination to conjure up images. I don’t want
an item by item shopping list of the person’s features and colouring. For this
reason, I only describe anyone’s looks when it is important to the story. For
example, I write crime, so if my villain has dark hair then all my red herring
people also need to have dark hair.
I think it’s more important for my readers to see my
characters as people, than be able to picture their looks exactly as I do. So,
how do I develop my characters?
Let’s take someone called Bob. When I put him into a story I
may not describe him, but I know
exactly what he looks like, even down to a slight cast in one eye. I know how
he got on with his parents and siblings, what makes him angry, what makes him
cry. I know what tickles his funny bone, what he does in his spare time that
he’s happy for everyone to know about – and what he does in his secret time
that he hopes no one will ever discover. I know what makes him blush, what type
of woman he dreams about, and also the type of woman he’ll end up with. I know
his hopes, his dreams and his fears. I know where he’d like to go on holiday if
he had enough money – and where he’ll go instead because that’s all he can
afford.
In other words, I know everything I need to know about Bob
at this stage. But now I want to develop him into a real person. To do that I
need to find out how he would react in certain situations.
I put Bob in a house on fire – what would he do? Would he
panic? Save himself without thought for anyone else? Would he be a hero even if
it meant his own life was in danger?
I put temptation in his way – financial and sexual. Would he
skim funds off if he thought no one would ever know, or is he rigidly honest?
Would he have an affair if he was convinced his wife would never find out, or
is he faithful enough to resist?
I put him in the path of a group of yobs picking on someone.
Would Bob step in to help the victim, or would he look the other way rather
than get involved?
I put him in a restaurant where he is given poor service and
bad food. Would he pay up and leave a tip, even though the waiter was surly, or
would he complain and demand the substandard food is replaced?
I put him on a train where it is clearly signposted no
mobile phones, then I put someone in the carriage who ignores the notice. Would
Bob draw attention to it? If yes, how? Would he be diffident? Angry? Forceful?
Apologetic? How would he deal with someone who carries on making calls?
I put him near the back of a long queue at the airport and
have someone queue jump. Does he get angry but do nothing, or does he confront
the queue jumper?
By the time I’ve answered all these questions I will know Bob
better than I know my own husband. In fact, I might swap him for Bob, depending
on the answers.
As with everything writing related, this method won’t work
for everyone, but it does the trick for me, so why not try it with one or two
of your characters?
Frances di Plino is the
pseudonym of columnist, editor, non-fiction author and writing tutor, Lorraine Mace. Writing as Frances di
Plino gives her the opportunity to allow the dark side of her personality to
surface and take control.
Her crime thriller, Bad Moon Rising, is published by Crooked
{Cat} Publishing.
Buy link for Bad Moon Rising: http://amzn.to/Q5zbEy
Great insights on how you deal with depicting your characters, Lorraine. Thank you for visiting, 'she said, he said...' , today.
Good morning, Lorraine. You've left some great tips for us today so i'm just off to try some out in my next WIP! Have a good day.
ReplyDeleteGreat post and good info for writers.
ReplyDeleteFabulous post, with some sound advice.
ReplyDeleteDescribing a character's looks is less necessary in crime fiction. When I read a good thriller (like Bad Moon Rising) I don't need a detailed account of everyone's shapes and sizes. My mind is occupied with other questions, such as 'who is the killer?'. In my view, description of looks would slow the pace, whilst showing emotions (fear, suspicion, etc) is far more effective.
Physical description is more important in romance. The reader needs to feel the attraction, and dropping hints about a hero's strong features or the heroine's curvaceous figure helps visualise their romantic attraction. I don't like full bit-by-bit description, though, as I prefer to make up my own mind on the subtle details of their looks. And, again, the emotion felt is far more effective.
A great post, Lorraine. Thanks for sharing.
Excellent post! Thanks Lorraine and Nancy.
ReplyDeleteFrances has had a problem replying, so here's her responses to Chastity, Cathie and Kimm:
ReplyDeleteThank you, everyone, for commenting. I hope my method is useful for some of you, but even if it isn't, it might prompt a new way of tackling the issue.
What a great post, thank you for sharing these tips.
ReplyDeleteThanks for stopping by D.J.
DeleteI've never looked at approaching characterisation like that before. Thanks for that!
ReplyDeleteIt's nice to have you pop in Yasminselena. I'm sure Frances will be delighted if you used some of her ideas!
ReplyDelete